This week at my blog I’m writing about BDSM in erotic romances. I thought I’d put the entry on consent up here. Please come by to visit and comment. I’m always interested to hear what people think on the subject.
Writers handle subjects in as many ways as well, there are writers. Me? I’m of the responsibility school. I’m not going to show the hero flossing his teeth, but in a contemporary erotic story, he’s going to use a condom or I give a reason why. That’s a personal thing. As a reader, I notice it every time couples in contemporaries don’t use condoms and all I can think about are STDs and pregnancy. It yanks me out of a very hot scene. I don’t need a huge deal to be made out of condom use, just an indication that it’s happening in one scene can establish it but I digress…
In BDSM books, I have my characters set rules and establish a safeword and outline consent. Consent is a really big button of mine. It’s why I don’t ever write rape as titilation and I don’t write or read forced seduction. Being raped isn’t sexy, it’s not fun. But playing with power and control is fun and as long as everyone is on the same page, play within those boundaries is sexy.
Mistress Matisse - a local Domme and a woman whose column I read on a regular basis (along with a very well written blog) did a piece in last week’s Stranger about consent.
What is the difference between BDSM and abuse? Kinky people would like to be able to draw a clear line, but like vanilla sex, it all spins on consent, and consent is a fluid, dynamic thing. You don’t give it once and that’s it for all time. You give it, either tacitly or overtly, every time you play.
The points she makes are important because when you give submission to someone, you’re handing yourself to them. That means as a sub, you’re trusting your partner and as a Dom, you’re taking charge of someone - we don’t read a whole lot about the responsibility of Dom/mes in books. They’re often stereotypes nearly as bad as the weak, broken submissive. The issue is that D/s and BDSM in general are play, yes, but with that comes responsibilty from both parties. Like any other sexual activity - you need consent and trust.
The lesson for dominants: Know your partner. Negotiate and get clear consent—and, yes, it can be done without being a buzz-kill. And be aware that no matter what someone says, you’re taking a leap of faith when you pick up the whip. For submissives: Even if you call yourself a slave, the person primarily responsible for your safety is you. If something’s going wrong, say so—promptly. A good dominant will want that information. Someone who doesn’t care isn’t someone you should belong to.
So in my D/s books, even in books where D/s is prominent enough that it’s more than just a slap on the ass or holding hands above the head, there’s going to be a discussion. The whole thing isn’t necessarily going to happen on the page, but the reader will know the submissive consented and also that the Dom made sure he had it. That’s part of sexy for me when I’m shaping a character - I want the Dom to be strong, yes, but intelligent and worthy of the submission he or she is seeking from his/her partner.
Yes, there are books and stories which play on “edge” ideas like no consent. I don’t read them and I don’t write them. I’m not saying they should be banned, I’m saying I don’t read them and I don’t write them and I’d never play that way.
Consent is sexy. For the submissive, having a safe word, knowing somehwere deep that he or she has a way to stop things if necessary is important but s/he also has a way to be pushed past comfort zones by a Dom who knows what he’s about. A Dom who cares to make sure she’s all right. That’s sexy.